(Opens in a new window) Read Our Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Founders Edition) Review That money could step you up to a higher grade of graphics card. In the end though, I still prefer the Core V2, but it is hard to ignore the $200 in savings with the Core X. It's a good value if you're willing to forgo the de facto docking ability that other graphics boxes deliver.
It can juice up nearly any Thunderbolt 3-equipped laptop with a late-model graphics card for a sizeable performance boost. While I ran across some uncomfortable bumps and wrangled with some manual updates in my testing, overall, the Core X did the job. The Core has always worked seamlessly with Razer's own laptops, but the Core X touts greater compatibility than before, now pulling some Apple MacBooks into the fold. With the Core X, Razer drops the price-and a handful of key features-for a more accessible and affordable ($299) take on external graphics acceleration. When I reviewed the $499 Razer Core V2 a few months back, I was pleased with the design and new features that Razer brought to its external graphics enclosure, even if it was a bit pricey. Some performance loss compared with desktop-PC installation.Not quite plug-and-play for non-Razer laptops.How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac.How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.
0 kommentar(er)
